Sitting in a Bar in Granite Falls

“Hey, if it isn’t the diehard partisan. How’s tricks?”
“Screw you.”

“Buy you a beer?”
“I’ll buy my own. Hey Mike, Jack straight up.”

“Whoa. Worse than I thought. Buck up, amigo; I’m sure Saddam’s death sentence will enliven, so to speak, the base, no?”
“He gassed his own people!”

“How about that Foley character?”
“Ain’t it just like a fag!”

“I wouldn’t know. Bad timing though, wouldn’t you say?”
“October surprise! Where’s the outrage?”

“Indeed.”
“Pages Gone Wild. That’s what it is!”

“I was more interested in the details of the recent NIE.”
“Another leak scandal! Mike, gimme another.”

“Slow down there, friend. I hate to say I told you so, but–”
“How about that lower than expected deficit!”

“Afghanistan is even a mess now. Couldn’t you just see that one coming?”
“The Dow hit 12,000!”

“Got any stock?”
“That’s personal.”

“Looks like the Senate’s in play, hmm?
“The tax cuts are working!”

“Can you imagine what the hearings are going to be like?”
“Cut and run! Cut and run!”

“Iraq is a disaster. What the hell are we going to do?”
“Stand up! Stand down!”

“Or perhaps kneel in prayer.”
“Religion of peace!”

“Wow. North Korea. Scary, eh?”
“Clinton strikes again!”

“Have you been following events in Baghdad? Looks like it’s coming apart.”
“How about those Cardinals!”

“Have another drink?”
“Stay the course and make it a double!”

To Awaken, Perchance to See

The various modes of worship, which prevailed in the Roman world, were all considered by the people, as equally true; by the philosopher, as equally false; and by the magistrate, as equally useful.
—Edward Gibbon, The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire

Hoisted by their own petard.
Sometimes when we dream the sound of the waking world intrudes. Once (and I swear this is true), home on leave and fresh from boot camp, sleeping on the couch with the television on, I jerked awake to the sound of reveille, as I had been every morning at 0530 for the previous three months. The bugle call was emanating from the television I had left on, now broadcasting an old movie about the cavalry.
I used to sleep with the radio playing, so I’ve had dreams with soundtracks, some incongruous, sometimes by chance perfectly apt. They always seemed to intrude just before awaking. Sometimes a hopelessly trite or silly song would interrupt the most fearsome nightmare; welcome, but with an unsettling, ironic effect.
I have felt, like so many that I encounter, that the last few years of the Bush miasma resemble an unrelenting nightmare. Is this latest scandal, with its familiar and sordid nature, like a frivolous pop tune that intrudes on the slumber of the nation, awakening some from a grim reverie, others to a grim reality?

I confess to feeling no significant sense of outrage at those sordid details of Rep. Foley’s misdeeds that have managed to penetrate the flimsy mental barrier that I’ve erected against them (I really do like to sit these things out). Neither, though, am I amused.
Similar to the Monica Lewinsky farce, I can’t help but feel nothing so much as embarrassment for the nation as a whole, that we have made this the current focus of our national dialogue. I have the same feeling of wanting only to be done with it. I will say this much: the outrage of the Democrats is as artificially augmented as the breasts on a stripper (excuse me, just trying to keep in the seamy spirit of the thing). But then, when the nation was treated to lurid details about cigars and blue dresses, the outrage of the Republicans and their outlying mandarins was just as affected. Same as it ever was.

Thus, I was going to write that the Foley scandal (hopefully) bringing down the foul reign of Karl Rove was unsatisfying. Why couldn’t they be called to the dock for their bloodier crimes? It would take a sex scandal, would it? And one has to lament, it is more the nature of such a scandal to quickly and completely capture the public’s attention with titillating details than any real outrage felt about abuses of power and sexual immorality that makes this the blow that may take down the fearsome Rovian beast. Our political process is largely determined by late night television. And Jack Paar is nowhere to be found.

But on further reflection, I can’t help but draw some perverse satisfaction. Rove, Bush, et al. have skillfully shanghaied social conservatives into the service of empire, with a level of deviousness that brings to mind the charlatans who led into slavery the waifs of the Children’s Crusade. I don’t mean to compare the average traditionalist to a child, but to an orphan; he is similarly abandoned, by his culture and political class.

The promises of the current “conservative” class of politicians have always been false, their personal behavior always strikingly hypocritical. The real sacrifices necessary to preserve some semblance of a coherent culture and moral code are an extremely hard sell, especially when they conflict with the aims of the Republicans’ and Democrats’ true patrons: the vested interests that bankroll the entire political enterprise. I’m reminded of a line from the film Boogie Nights, when the director, with droll understatement, tells the young actor, of the funding provided by the producer: “it’s an important part of the process.”
It may of course be that culture, community, and common morality are doomed by modernity and commerce. And politically, that is plain brown wrapper, behind-the-counter material.

Karl Rove has always recognized that all the great center of the nation wanted was that the ruling elite take them seriously, and for someone in power to address their concerns regarding our headlong flight from traditional morality into secular decadence; to frame these concerns as something other than rank bigotry. He knows how to make a show of it, and the opposition has made his job easy.
I remember reading a story in the New York Times about socially conservative voters before the election of 2004. It began something like this: John Smith is scared to death. What scares him is gay marriage. At the time I could only think to myself that with an opposition like the Democrats, the Republicans could very nearly phone it in. And in a sense they did, faxing talking points to the various corners of the mediasphere, with gay marriage prominent, I’m sure; right up there with the war and the failing empire, therein described as the “war on terror.”

After the election, I was talking to a liberal friend, both of us stunned and saddened that Bush had won re-election, and I angrily said that the Democrats were hopelessly negligent for making an issue of gay marriage. For a week afterward, I was deluged by forwarded emails, each something about alleged gay-bashing crimes. It would have been no use arguing that the connection between violence and gay marriage was specious; the indulgent sense of moral security my friend felt for being on the “right” side of the question was more important than anything else.
Here then was the manipulation viewed from the other side: conjured up tales of a terrified homosexual underground continually hounded by pick-ups full of leering, murderous thugs who can only be thwarted if civil unions become the law of the land. A nighttime horror story of monsters under the bed; the phony specter of a near threat to distract the childlike rabble from the reality of the daily slaughter destroying the republic from half a world away.
I can almost hear an IED exploding, punctuating the stomach churning black comedy of it all.

Sexual morality has always been hopelessly beyond the control of any secular government, thank goodness. All a conservative leader can offer is resistance to the excesses of rights activists and educators coupled with a plan for rolling back government programs that tend to engender the social pathologies of illegitimacy and irresponsibility; welfare, for instance. Add a principled opposition to abortion and you’ve nearly completed the slate of realistic and legitimate legislative goals for the traditionalist.

Of course the Rove/Bush cultural movement hasn’t done a thing to arrest any particular decline, nor has it offered any real opposition to either the welfare state or the durable system of race and sex preferences, offering only token resistance to tokenism when not joining in wholeheartedly. And where do they dump their most egregious example of an emblem promoted well beyond her merit? Atop the State Department.
A sound conservative tenet is to value deeds, and while domestically the Bush Administration has offered little more than tax cuts, profligate spending, and the occasional bullying gesture such as denying funding for stem cell research, abroad it has been very ambitious indeed.

Support for this so-called conservative agenda at home subsidizes the most aggressively interventionist agenda abroad. And few recall or even ever knew that there once was little connection between militarism and conservatism. The president seems to give speeches as often as not from the confines of a military base, and no one seems to mind; we are continually exposed to images of him with a uniformed formation behind him, like a minor dictator. And like many a minor dictator, his is a thoroughly incompetent military mind: his aggressive adventurism has been as poorly conceived, planned, and executed as it has been unprovoked.

But unlike the tinhorn despots he emulates, he is not an overpowering central figure surrounded by lackeys but an empty vessel into which a disdaining cabal of swaggering bureaucratic bullies pour their own ambitions and designs. Is it any wonder it seems no one is in charge?
And what tells this atheist observer that Bush is a pretender at piety? That he hasn’t the humility to know he has no business being president.

Rove and Bush have long benefited by the sense of unrelenting cultural siege felt by those who have no place in the Democrats’ hierarchy of grievance, those on whom it is always open season: traditionalist white Christians. People generally too immersed in the day to day business of work and family (that is to say, perpetuating the life of the nation) to be expected to invest the necessary time to unravel the ever increasing layers of Fox News bullshit disguising the true nature of current foreign policy. They trusted their leaders; that is, the ones who weren’t telling them they were hopeless troglodytes consigned to historical obscurity because they have misgivings about the post haste dismantling of any and all moral tradition.

Bush addressed their most exigent concerns, not with substance certainly, but with words. Then again, where else were they to go? The Democratic Party has abandoned them to the predations of corporate power and globalization with as much enthusiasm as the Republicans and, when it isn’t ignoring them completely, portrays them as the bogeyman with which they stir up the fears of their rubes. And all the while, the global designs of imperial conquest abroad and cultural dissolution at home proceed unheeded.

Of course the Democrats have lately been as inept at their particular form of demagoguery as the Republicans have been skilled. Relying on the phony populist rhetoric of the buffoonish Howard Dean, clumsily characterizing the middle class conservatives he’s trying to woo as rednecks in pickup trucks; revealing he’s never had a real conversation with either, and suggesting he holds each in equal disdain.
But then this appears, and we realize that it was inevitable that a highly placed hypocrite would be exposed. But the timing, it seems almost–providential.

But we’re nearly all hypocrites to some extent. That never did argue against the importance of a common morality to civilization. One might say it argues for it; we are all imperfect. Fallen, yes, like Mr. Foley, who I can’t help but feel a bit sorry for; at least until I consider his support for the war. Then it’s for the whole of us that I feel sorrow.
Chastity and temperance are vastly more appreciated when exhibited by the other guy. I can’t resist dusting off an old standard:

I want my attorney, my tailor, my servants, even my wife to believe in God, because then I shall be robbed and cuckolded less often.
—Voltaire

There is a legend often related along with this quote, that Voltaire once excused his servants before engaging in a frank discussion of religion that he feared would erode their faith.
The elected are our servants; let’s dismiss them so we may speak freely about their god, power.

UNTETHERED, FIRST ANNUAL REPORT

FOR THE EGOTISTICAL YEAR ENDING 30 AUG 2006 (EY 2006)


Dennis Dale, Owner, Founder, CEO

Letter to Blogreaders

The weblog, Untethered, established on 31 Aug. 05, states as its institutional goals: “The furtherance of the egotistical gratification of its founder by maximizing attention accrual through the manufacture and distribution of cultural analysis, satire, political commentary, and pseudo-intellectual posturing. Untethered’s near-term goal is the acquisition of world attention market share, furthering long-term aims of eventual global domination yielding complete and total breeding primacy.”

While significant barriers have revealed the daunting nature of these goals, I remain convinced that Untethered, after an exciting, challenging, and sometimes frustrating first year of operations, has adapted to the challenges faced to implement a dynamic business plan that provides the blog with a strategy for unlimited growth moving forward. Untethered has created an institutional culture that rewards innovation, initiative, originality, cunning, intellectual theft, bureaucratic infighting, and, above all, abject prostration before its CEO bordering on deification.
Untethered recognizes the blog environment is a virtual microcosm of the global environment. Therefore, in seeking to become a dominant player in the blogging industry, I have decided to adapt the methods and strategy used by the management of the largest, most powerful organization of that greater, real-world environment–the United States. That is why my new business model not only incorporates the traditional methods of attention-garnering such as attitudinal posturing, cloying allegiance to more powerful blogs, and of course snark-intensive assaults on rival product, but also more aggressive, pro-active, new-paradigmatic approaches to protecting and consolidating hard-earned attention share.
Untethered also recognizes the blog industry is a high risk environment fraught with conflict and ill-will. Adjusting to our new reality, management has implemented a dynamic new pre-emptive strategy for defending against any competitor’s attempt at drawing away attention share.
Blogging is a highly competitive, heavy attrition environment. Rival blogs that seek to do harm to Untethered are many. Therefore, I will not wait for other blogs to attack, but will concentrate on identifying threats not only before they reveal themselves, but before they develop; before they even exist. In today’s environment of heightened competitiveness, it is necessary to anticipate not only your competitor’s next move, but his next thought as well. I will destroy potentially hostile rogue blogs before even they know they are a threat. Indeed, many will not realize that they were destined to be threats.
Furthermore, I will do it with half the resources and effort. I’m very excited about this new way, adapted from the revolutionary, out-of-the-box thinking employed at the Department of Defense under the banner of “Force Transformation.” Soon I will be forging this blog into a lean, efficient force along the lines of Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld’s aggressive efficiency maximizing strategy. I’m not expecting to replicate the remarkable successes of that bold visionary, but feel confident that I’ve discovered a winner in this plan.
Together forward.
x
Dennis Dale
Owner, Founder, CEO, state ward

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Untethered’s egocentric goals are presented in United States Standard Self Esteem Points (USSSEP) in accordance with generally accepted blogger accounting principles (BAP).
Results are for EY 2006. (cont.)

Results of Operations
Untethered’s introductory product line of bellicose, invective-heavy opinion initially yielded a high return against minimal investments in thought and contemplation while incurring no significant expenditures on research. The limits of this model’s growth potential were quickly realized, however. The introduction of the satirical product line also proved successful, yielding a marginally higher return on a slightly greater cognitive investment, with a similarly limited growth horizon; I am currently researching ways to broaden this product’s appeal with the more attractive youth 18-24 demographic.
An attempted spin-off of a separate Department of Snark from the Satire Division was not successful, and was quickly shut down due to cost overruns and the immediate onset of managerial/talent disciplinary issues, related to the nature of the product and its well known tendency to produce an institutional culture of ill-will and inter-office dissension.
Attempts to introduce more cognitive labor intensive “prestige” product lines of esoteric philosophical argumentation and high-brow literary criticism remain mired in developmental issues. Introduction dates for both have been delayed as a result. I remain committed to expanding into these areas, and production for each is slated to ramp up in late 2007.
Overall, forecasts for the egotistical year ending 30 Aug. 2006 proved overly optimistic. Difficulties encountered include, but are not limited to:

1. Idea promulgation.

Forecasts predicting significant first year progress toward intellectual market domination proved unrealistic. Reasons for this include the insufficient ideational development resulting from ineffective R&D, faulty manufacture of ideas, inconsistent quality control, a near total lack of distribution capabilities, and ineffective marketing. Among the challenges faced:
(a) Scarcity of original analysis. A severe shortage of original thought continues to plague the ideational development department. Expertise and knowledge remain scarce commodities. Wisdom and clarity acquisition costs remain prohibitive.
(b) Quality Control. While shortages of crucial material required for the creation of original essays plagued manufacturing, Quality Control continued to struggle to deliver a competitive finished product, allowing unacceptable levels of irregular capitalization, redundant phrasing, excess verbiage, and substandard sentence construction. Difficulties resulting from a glut in the supply of semi-colons show no sign of easing. (cont.)
Report
UNITED STATES BLOGGING AND COMMENTARY COMMISSION
Seattle, WA 98101
Form 10-K

Â¥ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 132 OR 15(d)
OF THE BLOGGING EXCHANGE ACT OF 1998
For the egotistical year ended August 30, 2006
of
UNTETHERED, UNINC.
Seattle, 00001-01
007 Maladept Ave NWE

Seattle WA
Intellectual property registered pursuant to Section 10(a) of the Act:
Common Stock, .01 USSSEP par value, Seattle Virtual Commodities Exchange
Preferred Purchase Rights, Seattle Virtual Commodities Exchange
(cont.)

Pilgrimage

It’s funny how the colours of the like real world only seem really real when you viddy them on the screen.
–Anthony Burgess, A Clockwork Orange

You are a little soul carrying about a corpse.
—Epictetus

There are no bystanders in life.
Dignity is an aloofness from passion. It is the essence of the civilized individual. Yet civilization is people, and every day one’s dignity is compromised and risked in navigation of the multitude. The individual’s dignity depends on a common morality.

We affect a false sophistication (perhaps man always has) that we have transcended the unnatural (as if there were some inherent virtue here in “natural”) conventions of the past. But social convention has never been the denial of nature but its recognition. Formal manners, in imposing order and kindness on nature’s chaos and cruelty, recognize the fundamental conflict of being human: simultaneously possessed of awareness and by passion.

Modern comforts have so removed us from nature that we can now afford the pretense that we have banished convention and manners as, yes, pretense. Individuality and egalitarianism combine to make our new self-contradicting creed. Since this creed precludes shame as sinful, ridicule is the means of coercing one into, ironically, conformity. Curious, how much those who most loudly proclaim their individuality resemble one another, and are easily classified by type, in all their tattooed, pierced, sartorial desperation. Notice how often they pride themselves on belonging to a cultural subset, and the disdain with which they view those outside of it.

We have made a mass fetish of individuality. Yet individuality made into spectacle becomes so cheapened as to be rendered meaningless. True individuality requires privacy. Sanity requires privacy. There is no privacy left in the culture. So we retreat.
Community, as we’ve always understood it, is obsolete. This is a brand new development. In its absence we all necessarily exist at various stages of emotional remove from humanity. Some of us are in complete flight, and refuge has never been more near and easily attainable as we insulate ourselves within an electronic cocoon of a simulated human condition: drama, violence, comedy.

This is not a call to return to an irretrievable past, but merely a lament. It’s just that it’s in my nature to tally what is lost; I’m compulsively retracing my steps always. And something is always lost.

But in our insulation also we are privy to the most intimate features of the lives of our Olympians, the ever growing celebrity class (under constant surveillance); we are now even let into the lives of the rabble so we can point and sneer, via “reality” television. Every craven desire is titillated; every snobbish vanity humored. The laws of boredom and momentum require ever more revelation and and exposure to novelty. Distortion of reality is inevitable; so is the blurring of the line between ourselves and the electronic spectacle. Our media is a fun house mirror entertaining a populace that is tripping on acid. I’m not pointing fingers but merely owning up.

Every society has its heroic mythology. Ours is that we’ve vanquished hierarchy. Egalitarianism is the nearest thing we have to a common religion, and as such it is as mythological as any to come before. Predictably, it has delivered mediocrity instead of meritocracy. Our president, inheriting a birthright of wealth and power almost unheard of, postures as a regular guy. His lack of intellect is openly presented as a virtue for a populace suspicious of intellect. His lack of expertise is viewed as one less encumbrance. For all the derision he draws from the Left, he is the logical result of the sixties generation’s assault on standards. Our first postmodern president; eschewing empiricism, rigor, and reserve in favoring of crafting narratives and emphasising the importance of faith and feeling.
A recent article revealed his fondness for fart jokes. Ladies and gentlemen, the President of the United States. His purported love of flatulence humor, sadly believable though it may be, is not the cause of my dismay; it’s that this is offered as reassurance that our leader is no less human than we are. We, apparently, are afraid to be led by the exceptional. Indeed, the new order of things is to denounce and deny the existence of exceptional people. Fetishized worship of egalitarianism and individuality yield neither in practice, as even the president is an affable vulgarian.

Having discredited the idea of exceptional moral character as the bigotry of our forefathers, we are now left only with our reverence for the cunning and prowess in manipulating human networks that, as always, determines status. It’s the only exceptionalism we’ll allow ourselves. We are also insulated from being morally affronted (or confronted). To question all of this is to be a patsy, or worse: a “traditionalist”, and all that entails (racism, sexism, etc.). How curious, when tradition becomes a term of derision.

But this isn’t what I came to say.

He who removes himself from the fray and the company of others, whole or in part, thinks he is holding at bay the messy consequences of his humanity. This is a conceit. He is engaged in self-deception; his is a false dignity. He thinks life only scars you at close range, when there is no range—life is a point-blank affair for every one of us. Even the hermit in the deepest forest is no further removed from it. One can no more hold life at arm’s length than he can do the same with death.

A man who removes himself from society thinks he is escaping the consequences of being human. The world appalls him as it recoils before mortality; he thinks he will cheat it by refusing to care, but his is the most desperate flight of all, and he will die with no less, if not more, bitterness and regret. There is no escaping. If it’s true that none get out alive it’s also true that none pass through without living. There are no free riders.

From the moment of conception a life is speeding inexorably toward its ignoble demise: decline, death, and the body’s reclamation by the earth. Even as a man travels the triumphal upward half of his arc, his decline is written, not in the stars but in the genetic code. We console ourselves with wisdom, or its illusion, but would still trade the knowledge of the world for youth’s return. We shed an extra tear for those taken early; but it is of the rest of us that the highest bravery of all will be required. This is non-negotiable. There is no greater courage than that shown by aging gracefully; no greater and more embarrassing folly than to fail to do so. It is no less than heroic to do this one thing right.

To live is to decay. To live is to be part of the appalling ferment of germ and bacteria; breathing it in and breathing it out, enveloped by it. We are repulsed when it breaks out into the open.
How can this be, in a world of such remarkable beauty and creation? But it is. Clothing, convention, manners, art, artifice; civilization requires mass denial of the porous nature of humanity’s ectoplasmic shell. All art and religion is a refutation of the indignity and compromise of living. But one can’t choose not to get his hands dirty; quite literally. The obsessive-compulsive who fears contamination is one who has lost his ability to self-delude; he’s lost his sanity-preserving veil. He’s become more keenly aware of the microbial soup he lives in, and he’s gone insane.

Nature is cruelty; it takes this cherished body of yours, grinds it down and parcels it out to the elements with indifference. As if you were but a momentary and accidental coalescence of matter. And the only consolation you have, your only recourse, is to rail against this in a futile pursuit of immortality as you try to make a mark, any mark—any evidence that you’d been here. We are scratching our names in the windswept sand over and over again. All this noise and fury? All this building and tearing down? War, art, love? The aggregate of a billion voices raised in a cacophonous protest against mortality.

Still, there is a core consciousness within us that will not age. Is this what they call the soul? This disembodied consciousness is why we are apalled by the deterioration of our bodies despite fair warning. All the weariness, the disillusion, the heartache and vanity is draped about this unchanging core that witnesses it all with horror. If only I could free myself, it thinks. This consciousness, this soul, is trapped in its mortal vessel; captain of a ship he knows will sink, taking all hands to the bottom. To be human, sublimely conscious but no less an animal, is to be the only creature forced to witness its own demise.

We console ourselves with ritual. Some we don’t recognize. An atheist has to make do when it comes to ritual. I have no Mecca, no Holy Land, only the narcissistic return home. Retracing my steps. This periodic return serves to set in relief the changes in a place; it also reveals more starkly the changes in the pilgrim, whisking away the illusory veil of steady gradation.

For me, it’s a return to the scene of a crime long solved and forgotten. I’m forever returning to trace the chalk outline of my youth. I’m counting bullet casings, poring over transcripts, reconstructing scenarios. I will find nothing but I can’t help myself. I’m trying to disprove the reality that I am no different than anyone else. I’m the narcissistic, existential equivalent of a conspiracy theorist.

I walked a pier as I had years before, watching the waves, marveling at the thought that they have been continuing ceaselessly in my absence these many years; yet no two the same. Trite, perhaps, but that makes it no less confounding to me. I’m peering into these banalities as if I’ll find something, some key. And always the irrational, stubborn vanity: do they really exist if I’m not there to see them? Of course they do, and this too is hard to take: the insignificance of being one and small among the endless multitude.

Bikini-clad girls were loitering at the water’s edge; young, oblivious, beautiful. They are the same as the girls of my youth, and they too, like the waves, have been here always and are no two quite alike; different individuals, each absolutely self consumed worlds of their own like me. We pass through the thing itself, youth, and leave no mark. This is a bitter reassurance: it will all go on, without you.

The sense that time speeds up the nearer we come to our end suggests a destiny that we are vaguely, unconsciously aware of. After all, what do we really know of how we perceive time when we have no alternative to set it beside? There is no standard. Perhaps we know intuitively our position on nature’s cruel conveyor. Like the impossible idea of eternal recurrence—you have only the one life with no companion with which to compare it. If time doesn’t exist as we conceive it—and how could it?—then it could also be that there is but one moment. How does it contain us all?

Existence is like a constant we pass through. Death is as well, and in passing through to our uncertain fate we endure the suffering of every one of our fellow humans to come before. We suffer along with the multitudes who’ve died in countless wars and plagues, with those lost and alone praying for rescue, praying to the whole of humanity (they are praying to us over and over again, right now), eternally going unheard; we perish with all those that have expired en masse, voicing their agony in one horrifying voice. Contrary to what it seems, you are not alone when you die; you are never less alone.

The physically intangible thing that is the ideal of humanity is more real than any single, living being. How then does an idea expire, once thought? How then, does a life expire, once lived? The reality of humanity’s propagation, the mysteries not yet discovered, the cruel indifference of nature and its inestimable mass, all of this crushes the individual.
This then I realize: individuality is a fiction.

Nothing’s Going to Change My World(view)

Stephen Cox is a self described libertarian who makes a sensible argument against open borders here (courtesy of Tory Anarchist). His isn’t a libertarian argument so much as an appeal to his philosophical fellows to recognize that they live in a world that is nowhere near being guided by their principles, and will be no time soon. It is therefore disastrous to inflict the libertarian ideal of unrestricted borders on ourselves while we still grapple with the pathologies of the welfare state, multiculturalism, jihadism, and a world of vastly different cultural norms. Refusing to account for these things because one opposes them will not make them go away. As Cox points out, the libertarian will sometimes say that these are not problems of immigration per se, as if that should be the end of it; this imagined comparmentalization of the world, as if one massive social factor doesn’t impose on another and the vagaries of human existence can be swept under the rug of dogma makes some very smart people sound like fools. He ends with an apt refutation of such a willfully blinkered world-view:

Alexander Pope once parodied authors who had no sense of reality, authors who wrote things like:
Ye Gods! annihilate but Space and Time, and make two lovers happy.
The libertarian equivalent would be:
Ye Gods! annihilate but the facts of life, and make our dogmas triumph.

Live Blogging the Apocalypse (for real this time).

16:02
Only just now realized the date: Aug 22. It’s on. A full-scale assault from waves of Iranian suicide bombers could come at any minute.
16:12
Dug up some old body armor, pre-Iraq invasion but it’ll have to do; thank God I invested in that pallet of surplus MREs last May. Who’s laughing now?
16:40
Does anyone out there know anything about ham radios?
17:05
Forced out of the house to replenish beer stocks; suspicious character behind the counter, his “thank you come again” sounded insincere. I didn’t have time to subdue and take him into custody so I set fire to the dumpster behind his AMPM; hopefully when the authorities get there they’ll spot him–if they’re properly trained. God, I hope some of that Dept. of Homeland Security largesse landed in our humble Seattle suburb.
17:55
Can’t find The Glenn Beck Show. Oh no, no, don’t tell me they got Beck! You bastards! Has anyone checked to see if Bernard Lewis is alright?
18:24
“What on earth do you need a geiger counter for?” She said, mockingly. Yeah, she said that. I bet Joshua doesn’t have a geiger counter; oh, he’s got a Lexus, sure; lot of good it’ll do you now, man. What kind of post-apocalypse vehicle is a two-door luxury coupe, huh? Ahh, sweet retribution. Fortune favors the prepared.
1955
excuswe typoss haz matt gloves make typiong difficult hot in thgis damn fifities era hazmat suit
20:15
I don’t understand. Why haven’t we attacked? What’s wrong with you lilly-livered pukes? Do you want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud? The liberal media’s refusal to give this story its proper coverage has left us weak and demoralized; that’s it. C’mon George, pull the flight suit out of mothballs and get in there. As Sgt. Hartman says:
Why is Private Pyle holding that weapon? Why aren’t you stomping Private Pyle’s guts out?
21:30
I see their plan now. It’s asymmetric, that’s it. They’re not going to attack, thus making us out to be the crazies, and making us complacent for when they do attack. We must therefore attack. Before they attack. Or, before they decline to attack, which might even be worse. But attack we must.

Not a Cloud (in the sky).

Here’s an interesting tale of free love. Via Arts & Letters Daily.

Steve Sailer’s Sunday VDare column reminds me why it’s Steve’s World, and I’m just living in it.

I don’t really know why this little throw-away rant from the master of articulating righteous indignation at affrontery, aesthetic and otherwise, Udolpho, made me laugh out loud, but it did. Like a young, sane version of Howard Beale in the film Network, he’s mad as hell, etc. As Faye Dunaway’s character says of Peter Finch’s Beale (and what a pair of performances–though the two never share a moment on screen): “the American people need someone to articulate the popular rage.” Sometimes the outrage is as simple as not being able to get a drink in the privacy of your own home. These sorts of things are chronically underappreciated.

Well, laughter being a little easier to elicit at the moment might be for the same reason that I’m not posting anything substantial today. This requires a little background. I went on a bike ride, from a favorite starting point near one of the marinas here in Seattle. The marina is perched at the north end of Elliot Bay, which sidles up to Seattle, giving it a glorious sunny-day vista toward which the homes and apartments up in the hills turn their glassy window-eyes that glint in the sun; as if they’re all watching for the same ship to come in.
There’s a decent little bike path that runs the few miles from the marina to the tourist-attraction waterfront boardwalk, just blocks inland from there is downtown; and what a day here in Seattle, with just a few wispy remnants of clouds garnishing a brilliant blue sky. I won’t even try to do it justice.
Coming up on the park at the north end of the waterfront I was instantly made nostalgic by a certain smoky scent; one my mother once described as, after boning up on some How to Spot if Your Kid’s on Drugs literature, sickly-sweet (accusingly, if I recall correctly). No big deal in itself, of course, but it was as if someone was burning the stuff by the bushel; maybe the police destroying contraband?
Turns out this weekend was Seattle’s annual Hempfest. A massive festival celebrating all things hemp, and they clearly weren’t emphasizing knit backpacks and rope. Of course I had to dismount and take it all in on foot. It seems I managed to inadvertently “take it in” quite in fact; respiratorially. Having been hors de that particular sort of combat for years now I’ve developed a significantly lower tolerance to exposure; one that would have yielded a welcome economy those many years ago.
Anyway. The bicycling back was pleasantly surreal, a feeling of riding a little higher in the saddle, floating along; the music in my earphones sounded incredible (the best music ever recorded, I’m convinced), enjoyable even while I was briefly lost trying to make it back to the truck.
I arrived home and polished off half a Marie Callendar’s frozen coconut cream pie, spent two hours plucking away the same three chord rhythm on an out-of-tune guitar (I’ve never sounded so good!), and started to craft this post as one of those round-ups of articles of interest, but then only managed about three paragraphs of Norman Podhoretz’s posturing as the last true defender of the faith known as the “Bush Doctrine” (courtesy of Dr. Leo Strauss at Stop the Spirit of Zossen [by the way, if you ever read the phrase “hat tip” here, I’ve been abducted and replaced by an impostor]) before my buzz was thoroughy destroyed. That it was acquired by purely accidental and innocent circumstances (I feel compelled to reiterate–a sort of immaculate intoxication) doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be managed–all the more so–for enjoyment and guided to a soft landing. Damn neocon buzzkills. Oh well.
Nappy time.

The Brave and the Bogus

The Christian Science Monitor is running a series by Jill Carroll that chronicles her time as a hostage of terrorists in Iraq. Carroll was pilloried by the usual suspects among the keyboard commando forces earlier this year for making a video critical of the occupation and praising her captors for their treatment of her (under duress while still held in captivity–by a group sympathetic to al Qaeda in Iraq that had already killed her Iraqi interpreter when abducting her). Of the many shameful episodes that our warbloggers will hopefully someday have to atone for, this outpouring of affected outrage stands out for its petty and senseless nature.
It was said that Carroll was critical of the war–God forbid–before her abduction; this, and the fact that she set out to get the story from the Iraqi point of view, were her true transgressions.
What this remarkably brave young woman did, after already serving as an embedded reporter with the Marines following them into what infantry grunts call the Shit, was leave the relative safety of that embed to witness more completely the war’s effect on Iraq (seeking the facts on the ground, or, to leaven the phrase with the disdain of quotation marks as none other than Norman Podhoretz has taken to: “the facts on the ground”). Reporting the story. Perhaps it’s also that her kidnapping illustrated dramatically just what a disaster the war is and how reporting on it is more dangerous than any other conflict in American history, contradicting the tired but persisting the-liberal-press-is-only-reporting-the-negative mythmeme, that galled them so.

I came to laying on my side on a concrete bench. My head was at such an extreme angle and my neck so stiffened by this unnatural position that I knew raising it would be a painful, if not impossible, affair; I opted to roll over onto my stomach and slowly push myself up into a sitting position while leaving my head, more or less, in its listing attitude. This too was no easy feat, accomplished by grunting, groaning effort. Laughter, accompanied by a lewdly malicious voice, attracted my attention from the other end of the cell. Two locals were sitting there watching me. He spoke again, the fat one with the leer in his voice and eyes, in a colloquial Spanish that I didn’t understand. I said nothing.
Looking down I noticed my pockets had been turned inside out; my shoes were gone. I did not yet know how I arrived there; I sensed a partially formed, vague memory lurking just below the surface of consciousness. I tried retracing my steps mentally: the girl in the bar, dancing, being led onto the beach, rolling around in the sand. So far so good; too bad there’s no way this one ends well. Sort of like a movie that reveals the hero’s death in the first frame. Closing my eyes I tried to pierce memory’s fog, at once afraid and enticed by what I might find there.
A dim scene played out: the girl was suddenly screaming at me; I was beseeching her to be quiet, asking in broken Spanish what was wrong: trying to say, ¿Cuál es la materia?, and just managing to stammer, qual estimer, qual estimer? At the same time thinking her hysteria seemed odd, acted. Get away, a foreign and sober impulse welled up into my sloshed mind, get away from her. Several missing frames later and I’m struggling in the deep, loose Baja sand; wheezing, stagger-running, covering as much distance from side to side as forward but making progress back toward the plaza, and the hotel. Memory submerged, and only briefly resurfaced to reveal a glimpse of being herded into the back of a Mexican police car by baton blows, kicks, and epithets.
I was now staring at the wall across from me; it was covered in a profusion of graffitti, mostly vulgarities in Spanish. I realized I had been staring at a word. It shimmied and danced as a pair that separated, nearly aligned, and separated again repeatedly as I fought my double vision. I tried closing one stinging eye; I couldn’t, like a very young child who can’t yet move his eyelids indepently. So I placed a hand, trembling slightly as if a small electric current was running through it, over one eye.
Slowly the word came into focus. No, I thought, no possible way. But there it was. Faint and weathered by countless years, crudely etched in jagged lines; I could just make out:
UNTETHERED

; ;; ;;;;; ;;;;;;!

; ;; ;;; ;;;;;–;;;; ;;. ;;; ;;; ;;;;;; ;;;;;;;; ;; ;;; ;;;;;; ;;:

; ;; ;;; ;;;;; ;;; ;;;; ;; ; ‘;;;. ;; ;; ; ;;; ; ;;;; ; ;;’? ;; ;;; ;;; ; ;;;
;;;; ; ;;;;!”

;; ;;;;; ; ;;;; ;; ;;;. ;;; ; ;;;; ;; (;;;, ;;; ;;;;: [;;;; ;;; ; ;;:] ;;; ;;; ;;;; ;;). ; ;;; ;; ;;;; ;; ;;;, ;; ;;; ;;;;; ;; ;; ;;;;. ; ;;; ;;;; ;;;; ;;;; ;;;. ;;; ;; ;;; :

1. ;;; ;.;.;.;. ;;;;; ;; ;.

2. ;;; ;; ;;; ;.

3. ; ;; ;;; ;;;; ;;;;;;.

; ;; ;;; ;;;;; ;;;; (;;; ;; ;;;;).

;;;;;;;;;;.